Key Governance Factors for Higher Education Prove to Be Quantifiable (FGA and Commonfund Institute)

FGA and Commonfund Institute recently announced joint study on governance in higher education, the Commonfund-FGA Benchmarking Study of Governance (CFSG). In this second major phase of research, the group found results that validated and confirmed the findings of the initial five-year study of public pensions at Marquette University. Asset owner governance considerations remain critical for mission development, financial outcomes and addressing complex issues.

https://www.commonfund.org/blog/key-governance-factors-prove-to-be-quantifiable

Does Good Governance Lead to Better Investment Performance? (Commonfund)

The governance framework of an institution plays a significant role in its overall success. Based on our work with hundreds of higher education institutions over the past 50 years, we believe that good governance is critical to the health of the institution and the positive performance of the endowment. Most people intuitively agree that “good” governance is imperative but currently there is a dearth of quantitative research available that defines and measures the difference that it can make. To rectify this and help to move the industry forward, Commonfund Institute is embarking on a new research project titled, The Commonfund-FGA Benchmarking Study of Governance in Higher Education

The Study is the first of its kind and is being done in conjunction with Chris Merker and Fund Governance Analytics (FGA). FGA is a pioneer in the field of empirical governance research and evaluation of asset owners and operates in partnership with Marquette University. Their governance diagnostics are derived from decades of research and evaluation and have been used extensively to analyze the governance practices of public pension funds. This is the first time that these tools will be applied to higher education endowments.

https://www.commonfund.org/blog/does-good-governance-lead-to-better-investment-performance-in-higher-education-institutions

Short-termism Revisited (CFA Institute and Fund Governance Analytics)

Improvements made and challenges in investing for the long-term

In 2020 CFA Institute convened a panel revisiting the topic of short-termism and commissioned Fund Governance Analytics to quantitatively analyze the issue as we found many companies reluctant to step away from the short-term earnings guidance game.

https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/advocacy/policy-positions/short-termism-revisited

Overview

Issuers and investors have begun to understand the importance of issuer–investor communications in getting both sides on the same page on many long-term strategic issues. In the years since our 2006 report was published, investors and issuers have increasingly invested in resources dedicated to fostering engagement. Both parties realize that building a trusting relationship can increase understanding and avoid the adversarial relationships that often existed between the two groups in the past.

These improvements in the short-termism and long-termism landscape should indeed be celebrated, but more work remains to be done. Many companies have traded in short-term earnings guidance for either long-term guidance or a more diverse set of metrics that better informs investors. 

Enhancing Stewardship with Fund Governance Analytics (Commonfund Institute)

https://www.commonfund.org/news-research/video/enhancing-investment-stewardship-with-fund-governance-analytics/

Strong board performance is critical for every organization dedicated to achieving its mission, which is why Commonfund Institute makes it our mission to advance best investment stewardship practices. We were delighted to present Christopher Merker, co-Founder and Executive Director of Fund Governance Analytics and co-Author of The Trustee Governance Guide: The Five Imperatives of 21st Century Investing. Chris’ research demonstrates that the best run organizations outperform their peers nearly 2 to 1. Watch this video to learn more.

Honor and Responsibility: The Five Stewardship Imperatives (Trusteeship)

https://agb.org/trusteeship-article/honor-and-responsibility-the-five-stewardship-imperatives/

It should come as no surprise to trustees that boards have come under increased pressure in recent years to be more purposeful in the how they govern, specifically when it comes to mission and overall governance. There are several possible reasons for this increased attention on mission and governance but a pioneer in the field of governance and investment research, Keith Ambachtsheer, identifies three most likely explanations. In his foreword in The Trustee Governance Guide: Five Imperatives of 21st Century Investing, he reflected on the three main reasons nonprofit organizations have become increasingly focused on their mission and governance in recent years.¹

■ Governance as a process is finally receiving the bright spot it deserves;
■ The time has come to recognize the rise of behavioral economics and its lessons for trustee decision making; and
■ Sustainable investing is increasingly displacing “quarterly capitalism” as the philosophical foundation for long-term wealth creation.

The ESG Debate Heats Up: Four More Challenges (CFA Enterprising Investor)

https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/investor/2020/02/04/the-esg-debate-heats-up-four-more-challenges/

Investors and Managers: Now Join Hands.

As fires continue to ravage Australia, debates among environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investment professionals have been blazing as well.

One LinkedIn commentator, Dr. Raj Thamotheram, observed:

“There is so much ‘sdg washing’ and ‘impact washing’ going on at the moment, it drives me mad. We shouldn’t pretend that buying a share of XXX in the secondary market is changing the world. Change is slow and incremental. [My employer] isn’t perfect, we try to put our best foot forward, that inevitably leads us to be optimistic in describing what we do on ESG. But I try to be as brutally honest as I can. I’m amazed at how many peers say in the PRI reports that they do ESG integration across all asset classes 100%. Really? And if so, what does that actually mean?

“The answers aren’t easy but the challenge is urgent and CEOs of member firms need to mandate corrective action in 2020.

DOES PUBLIC PENSION BOARD COMPOSITION IMPACT RETURNS? (Boston College – Center for Retirement Research)

https://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/SLP67.pdf

U.S. state and local pension funds manage over $4 trillion in retirement assets for 20 million active and retired plan members. Given the significance of these funds, proper oversight is vitally important to government officials, plan participants, and taxpayers alike. The challenges to effective pension fund governance have been well documented, and significant research has demonstrated that the characteristics of pension boards matter. This brief summarizes public pension fund governance, discusses key aspects of public pension boards, and presents additional evidence that a well-designed board relates to better plan outcomes.