Month: January 2020

Posted on

Why Invest? A 22-Year-Old’s Tough Questions About Capitalism (WSJ)

https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-invest-a-22-year-olds-tough-questions-about-capitalism-11579882164?emailToken=1f6f40da21c2a67f4c5d3cefc394a4ef321sWZm7l91akMf29D3jectUr4s5BbuodUHQ15r53k/VLpRgJBHlM22HDkmaMULdEvcS+gzG9uVohhM7aK9jCLO6LA0M+fnOjtCyjC04thC/WhtPLrayQCYOxOlP4FsD&reflink=article_email_share

A few days ago, a smart 22-year-old asked me how to invest some savings from her first job. I advised her to open an individual retirement account. When she found out she couldn’t withdraw it without penalty until she turns 59 1/2, she shot back: “By then the planet will be a rotating cinder!”

The many young people who seem to share her gloomy view of the future should read the new book by Laurence B. Siegel, “Fewer, Richer, Greener.” In it, he proclaims, “We are on the verge of the greatest democratization of wealth and well-being that the world has ever known.”

Posted on

New Investments and Research Indicate Multi-Trillion Dollar Market for Climate Restoration Through Carbon-Capture (Thunderbird)

https://thunderbird.asu.edu/knowledge-network/wef

Thunderbird Convenes Global Leaders Across Sectors to Advance Climate Action

Davos, Switzerland – Thunderbird School of Global Management released a new report today projecting that the world can realize at least $1 trillion – $3 trillion dollars in market opportunities and $3 trillion – $5 trillion dollars in broader economic, social and environmental benefits per year by 2030.

Thunderbird’s Director-General and Dean, Dr. Sanjeev Khagram authored the new report and shared it at a cross-sectoral gathering hosted by Thunderbird with the Foundation for Climate Restoration in Davos during the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting. 

“Together, we must rapidly deploy natural and technological solutions to remove gigatons of carbon dioxide from our air, restore ocean ecosystems, and preserve Arctic ice, while dramatically reducing emissions and adapting to climate change impacts,” said Dr. Khagram. “Climate restoration is the critical third pillar of climate action alongside climate mitigation and adaptation.”

Posted on

Larry Fink rules on the best global standards for climate risk reporting (FT)

https://www.ft.com/content/fc51227b-9d64-4e5a-b1e2-f6c07f4caa58

BlackRock chief Larry Fink has warned that the world’s largest asset manager will take a “harsh view” of companies that fail to provide hard data on the risks they face from climate change.

In the letter, Mr Fink said that by the end of the year he wanted all companies to “disclose in line with industry-specific” guidelines set out by the SASB — the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, a non-profit organisation that sets voluntary financial reporting standards.  He also called for businesses to report under the TCFD, or the Task Force on Climate-related Disclosures, a voluntary framework that was spearheaded by Mark Carney, the outgoing governor of the Bank of England

Posted on

BlackRock shakes up business to focus on sustainable investing (FT)

Fund manager to double number of sustainability-focused exchange traded funds it offers

https://www.ft.com/content/57db9dc2-3690-11ea-a6d3-9a26f8c3cba4

BlackRock has unveiled sweeping changes in an effort to position itself as a leader in sustainable investing after criticism that the company has failed to use its clout to combat climate change. The world’s largest fund manager, with $7tn in assets, will double the number of sustainability-focused exchange traded funds it offers to 150. It will also cut companies that derive a quarter or more of their revenues from thermal coal from its actively managed portfolios, as it aims to increase its sustainable assets 10-fold from $90bn today to $1tn within a decade.

Posted on

Ignoring climate risk is more costly than grappling with it (Huw van Steenis-FT)

Regulators and activists are driving global warming concerns into the mainstream

https://www.ft.com/content/dc2bdac0-316c-11ea-9703-eea0cae3f0de

A trio of recent deals tells us something important about capital markets: that 2020 may be the year when climate-risk analysis of portfolios moves out of a niche into the mainstream. Investors and boards have begun to realise that it can be more costly to ignore these issues, than to try to grapple with them. Last September MSCI, the global index company, bought Carbon Delta, a boutique focusing on climate risk analysis. A few months earlier Moody’s acquired Four Twenty Seven, a similar boutique. Last year ended with S&P making a move for sustainable index player RobecoSAM.

Posted on

Part 1 of Ethics, ESG, and ERISA: Ethical-Factor Investing of Savings and Retirement Benefits (Albert Feuer)

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3501203

Abstract

Ethical-factor investing is investment decision-making that takes into account ethical factors. It includes faith-based investing, Environmental, Social or Governance (ESG) investing, and sustainable investing. It is becoming more and more widespread. This has occurred despite a lack of widely accepted definitions, performance metrics, or ethical preferences. There is increasing broad agreement that some ethical factors highlight business risks and opportunities in a predictable fashion, such as the effects of climate change, human capital needs, or corporate governance. Thus, more and more investors and enterprises are seeking to profit (including mitigating risks) from these factors in the same way they do from all business risks and opportunities. There are three prudent approaches to ethical-factor investing. The most widely used is the Incorporation approach. Such investing uses the value of doing the right thing to decide how to improve financial returns. Also, quite common is the Tie-Breaker approach. Such investing does the right thing if there no financial cost to doing so. Least common is the concessionary approach. Such investing does the right thing if it does not cost too much. Each of these approaches can be socially beneficial, i.e., improve the norms and behavior of enterprises in a cost effective manner. Investors can generate such benefits by funding enterprises with thinly traded securities whose preferred ethical-factor activities would not otherwise occur, or by participating in engagement campaigns to change the policies of widely traded securities in which they invest.

Posted on

ESG and the Commons: From Tragedy to Governance? (Financial Times and CFA Institute)

https://www.ft.com/paidpost/cfa-institute/esg-and-the-commons-from-tragedy-to-governance.html

“A resource arrangement that works in practice can work in theory.” — Elinor Ostrom

Sustainable investing will become the rule and no longer the exception. But this transition comes amid a disquieting change in how we must view capital, production, and their attendant effects.

Promoting the Common Good or Promoting Destruction?

In Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations, the pursuit of individual goals brings about — on balance — the right outcomes on a broad community scale. Think of the baker baking bread for profit: The act itself — the supplying of bread — clearly promotes the common good, even if the common good wasn’t the original intent. This, of course, underestimates the role of “externalities” in economics, or how self-interest can lead to the eventual and total destruction of certain resources. As Garrett Hardin wrote in his seminal “The Tragedy of the Commons”: