Letter: Perhaps the New Mantra Should Be ESG Materiality (FT)

https://www.ft.com/content/7de1b83c-7752-11ea-af44-daa3def9ae03

David Stevenson, in “Are ESG and sustainability the new alpha mantra?” (FTfm, April 6), identifies an important paradigm shift: rather than using environmental, social and governance considerations as an “add-on” to a typical investment process, many are discovering that investors can use ESG concerns as a screen to avoid future poor-performing companies. But this suggests that ESG screens can also be used to find attractive companies to short. Indeed, as some past studies of mine and others show, negatively linked ESG can generate even greater alpha than positively linked ones. I liken this principle to the observation that we tend to like good companies but hate bad ones. In addition to avoiding bad companies, ESG screens can also help find excellent companies. For example, approximately 40 per cent of large US companies now explicitly compensate their top executives for various ESG outcomes. These executive contracts tend to increase both future ESG and financial performance.

Marquette Business Continues to Lead in Sustainable Finance and Investment Education (Marquette Business)

https://medium.com/@MUBusiness/marquette-business-continues-to-lead-in-sustainable-finance-and-investment-education-c5280cc7345b

“Sustainable finance and investing are taking off- and the world’s top business schools are climbing on board” — Wall Street Journal, 6/10/2019

An article in the Wall Street Journal recently declared that sustainable finance and investment education is making its way into higher education curriculum. But at Marquette, that change happened over a decade ago.

In the 2005-2006 academic year, Dr. Sarah Peck developed and taught the course Investment Ethics. Dedicated to understanding the central role that ethical concepts and consequences play in the practice of finance and specifically investments,this course was one of the first of its kind across the country. Taken up and taught by Dr. David Krause, director of the Applied Investment Management program thereafter, the course eventually landed in the capable hands of Dr. Christopher Merker, Instructor of Practice for Marquette University who has taught the course since 2009.

“War Powers” in a Time of Corona: Learnings for the Climate Crisis (Chris Merker)

In light of significant and rapid changes occuring across the globe, arguably climate change and environmental impacts should be approached with similar urgency. Activists have been saying this for years, and now we have an opportunity to see how humanity reacts during an all-out crisis. In and throughout, the world has become in effect a laboratory for responding to a massive – and entirely global – economic shock, and every government has taken a range of a policy approaches with differing levels of efficacy.

Encouragingly we have seen a “can do” and “nothing will stop us” attitude that has crossed political divides as both the public and private sectors joined hands to resolve the crisis.

Image result for coronavirus
Coronavirus cases globally (WHO)

However, a major point of difference, is the absence of any similar level of intensity in addressing the climate crisis. This is in marked contrast to how the world addressed ozone depletion a generation ago, which, while not reaching “coronavirus” levels, did rally substantial, coordinated and targeted response globally in resolving that crisis. One commentator suggested that if carbon emissions came with a bad smell or turned the skies purple, we would see a more ready and visceral reaction from everyone. Because we can’t see, taste or feel carbon emissions, while no less damaging, the perception of immediate threat is not present in this instance.

So, after the dust has settled on the corona crisis, how can we apply recent learnings and experience to the climate crisis?

  1. Understand that collective actions can make an impact – Social distancing doesn’t work without everyone’s participation. What has slowed the spread of the coronavirus was everyone opting in and participating in this radical change in behavior. Similarly, we will need to change our behaviors in a number of ways: what we do and how we do it as we transition to a low carbon economy.
  2. Governments must overcome political divide to create effective policy solutions – While our leaders argued over some of the details as we worked to construct the largest fiscal stimulus package in history to mitigate the economic impact from COVID-19, no one disagreed over the objectives or need for immediate action. We need similar cohesion in addressing the climate crisis. This is still not present, and will be key.
  3. Countries must coordinate their actions – The coordinated actions of leaders and central banks has been key in addressing this crisis. Such multi-lateral coordination must take place in a way that we haven’t seen to date, despite attempts through agreements such as the Paris Accords, which has clearly been absent major countries – and the largest carbon contributors – in particular the U.S. and China. Just as important are the coordinated plans and execution of those plans following such agreements.
  4. Allow the experts and technicians to lead, and recognize that technology and innovation will play a role – Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, and others, who understand health policy and pandemics have been given license to act and lead in ways that are critically important on setting us on a path to mitigate the effects of the pandemic, and get on a path to recovery. Similarly we must turn to those who understand the climate and impacts to the environment to mitigate further damage, and put us on a transition path to sustainability. We must fund and incentize businesses to continue developing and expanding critical products and technologies to pave the way to the transition, just as we are seeing during this crisis.
  5. Plan the transition – How do we get from A to B? In this case the strategy was to “flatten the curve” to ensure our health system has the necessary capacity to respond to reduce the human cost, and delay the impacts to allow time to develop a vaccine. What will be our strategy for the climate crisis, and how do we get from A to B, to at the same time minimize disruption and minimize human cost?

In the final analysis, everyone has to agree to do whatever it takes – In this crisis, everyone has come together and responded, together. This collective purpose and global spirit of cooperation must pervade to the same extent to take on the monumental challenge of transitioning from a carbon-heavy to a carbon-neutral economy, an entire shift in the way our civilization operates today.

In recent days I have been encouraged, with commitments by companies that include those from the energy sector, including some major oil and utility companies. I believe we can get there, but it will take all of us working together to help assure a better future for us and the generations that follow.

A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data (STAT)

https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/

The current coronavirus disease, Covid-19, has been called a once-in-a-century pandemic. But it may also be a once-in-a-century evidence fiasco.

At a time when everyone needs better information, from disease modelers and governments to people quarantined or just social distancing, we lack reliable evidence on how many people have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 or who continue to become infected. Better information is needed to guide decisions and actions of monumental significance and to monitor their impact.

Draconian countermeasures have been adopted in many countries. If the pandemic dissipates — either on its own or because of these measures — short-term extreme social distancing and lockdowns may be bearable. How long, though, should measures like these be continued if the pandemic churns across the globe unabated? How can policymakers tell if they are doing more good than harm?

Q&A: A Harvard Expert on Environment and Health Discusses Possible Ties Between COVID and Climate (InsideClimate News)

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/11032020/coronavirus-harvard-doctor-climate-change-public-health

Doctors and public health researchers are getting an increasingly accurate and nuanced picture of the many ways climate change damages human health. 

Now, questions have arisen about whether climate change contributed to the outbreak of COVID-19, whose spread the World Health Organization declared a pandemic on Wednesday. For example, did habitat loss, driven in part by climate change, make it easier for pathogens to spread among wildlife and for the virus to jump to humans? Does air pollution, mainly from the burning of fossil fuels, make some people more vulnerable to contracting the illness? 

Climate Change Has Lessons for Fighting the Coronavirus (NYT)

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/climate/climate-change-coronavirus-lessons.html

“Alarming levels of inaction.” That is what the World Health Organization said Wednesday about the global response to coronavirus.

It is a familiar refrain to anyone who works on climate change, and it is why global efforts to slow down warming offer a cautionary tale for the effort to slow down the pandemic.

“Both demand early aggressive action to minimize loss,” said Kim Cobb, a climate scientist at the Georgia Institute of Technology who was teaching classes remotely this week. “Only in hindsight will we really understand what we gambled on and what we lost by not acting early enough.”

Honor and Responsibility: The Five Stewardship Imperatives (Trusteeship)

https://agb.org/trusteeship-article/honor-and-responsibility-the-five-stewardship-imperatives/

It should come as no surprise to trustees that boards have come under increased pressure in recent years to be more purposeful in the how they govern, specifically when it comes to mission and overall governance. There are several possible reasons for this increased attention on mission and governance but a pioneer in the field of governance and investment research, Keith Ambachtsheer, identifies three most likely explanations. In his foreword in The Trustee Governance Guide: Five Imperatives of 21st Century Investing, he reflected on the three main reasons nonprofit organizations have become increasingly focused on their mission and governance in recent years.¹

■ Governance as a process is finally receiving the bright spot it deserves;
■ The time has come to recognize the rise of behavioral economics and its lessons for trustee decision making; and
■ Sustainable investing is increasingly displacing “quarterly capitalism” as the philosophical foundation for long-term wealth creation.

Last Chance for the Climate Transition (FT)

Achieving zero emissions by 2050 would require unprecedented global co-operation

https://www.ft.com/content/3090b1fe-51a6-11ea-8841-482eed0038b1

At the World Economic Forum in Davos this year, two people stood out: Greta Thunberg, the 17-year-old Swedish climate activist, and Donald Trump, the US president. In their messages on climate change, these two could not have been more opposed: panic, confronted with indifference. But one thing they share is that they are not hypocrites: Ms Thunberg does not pretend we are doing anything relevant; Mr Trump does not pretend he cares. Most participants in the climate debate, however, pretend to care, pretend to act, or both. If anything is to be done, this must change.

Ours remains what it has been since the early 19th century: a fossil-fuel civilisation. There have been two energy revolutions in human history: the agricultural revolution, which exploited far more incident sunlight; and the industrial revolution, which exploited fossilised sunlight. Now we must return to incident sunlight — solar energy and wind — along with nuclear power, while maintaining our high standards of living.

How passive investment dulls the green wave (FT)

https://on.ft.com/2Sqcjbn

Passive index trackers help to keep money flowing to high-carbon industries

With such a strong financial case against fossil fuels coming into focus, and starting to convince holdouts, activists’ plans to starve oil, gas and coal companies of capital should get a boost as investors abandon the sector for non-ideological reasons. Yet even with this tailwind, the impact of their campaign will be limited as long as people continue ploughing money into market-tracking passive funds.

The ESG Debate Heats Up: Four More Challenges (CFA Enterprising Investor)

https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/investor/2020/02/04/the-esg-debate-heats-up-four-more-challenges/

Investors and Managers: Now Join Hands.

As fires continue to ravage Australia, debates among environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investment professionals have been blazing as well.

One LinkedIn commentator, Dr. Raj Thamotheram, observed:

“There is so much ‘sdg washing’ and ‘impact washing’ going on at the moment, it drives me mad. We shouldn’t pretend that buying a share of XXX in the secondary market is changing the world. Change is slow and incremental. [My employer] isn’t perfect, we try to put our best foot forward, that inevitably leads us to be optimistic in describing what we do on ESG. But I try to be as brutally honest as I can. I’m amazed at how many peers say in the PRI reports that they do ESG integration across all asset classes 100%. Really? And if so, what does that actually mean?

“The answers aren’t easy but the challenge is urgent and CEOs of member firms need to mandate corrective action in 2020.